|
Do all student athletes need heart screenings?
Do all student athletes need heart screenings?
University of Michigan heart specialists weigh in on how best to reduce sudden deaths in competitive athletes
ANN ARBOR, Mich. – Seemingly every year there are reports of a young, apparently healthy athlete dying on the court or playing field.
The sudden death of Wes Leonard, a junior at Fennville High School, who died of cardiac arrest from an enlarged heart on March 3, may have parents and coaches wondering if enough is being done to identify athletes at risk for dying suddenly.
"We would like to develop a better screening program to help prevent sudden cardiac death, but there is not enough rigorous data to support what that should look like," says Sanjaya Gupta, M.D., clinical lecturer in the Division of Electrophysiology at the University of Michigan Health System.
Some communities have begun programs to perform more extensive heart testing, including electrocardiograms and sometimes echocardiograms on students before they compete.
Yet a task force organized by the American Heart Association to evaluate pre-participation screening practices has not supported such community programs due to a lack of evidence that they are able to reduce the number of sudden deaths.
A large trial recently completed in Israel concluded that mandatory ECG testing of athletes prior to sports participation did not reduce the number of deaths from sudden cardiac arrests.
"One of the major obstacles to developing a better screening process is that no one heart test is the best," says Mark Russell, M.D., a pediatric cardiologist at the University of Michigan's C.S. Mott Children's Hospital. "There are a number of different heart conditions that can cause sudden death in a young athlete.
"For some heart conditions, the ECG is the best test. For other heart problems, an echocardiogram is required," Russell says. "Unfortunately, both tests are usually normal in some individuals whose heart problem can only be diagnosed with an exercise stress test."
Furthermore, some conditions such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, a thickening of the heart, or dilated cardiomyopathy, the cause of death of the Fennville, Mich. Teen, can develop over time. A single screening may not detect the condition.
As many as 10 million to 12 million young athletes in the United States participate in competitive athletics, identifying which of those athletes is at significant risk of sudden death is a bit like finding a needle in a haystack, doctors say.
How can you responsibly identify the student who is at risk without excluding thousands of other students from participating in sports?
The most important step may be to ensure that the screening process outlined by the AHA is being performed as recommended. The AHA recommendations require that the screening form document 12 specific aspects of the student's personal medical history, his/hers family medical history and a physical exam. If any concerns are identified based on the initial screen, then referral to a cardiologist is recommended.
Unfortunately, until very recently, the pre-participation screening form approved by the state of Michigan only covered five of the 12 topics recommended by the AHA. Russell and other colleagues from U-M were involved in updating the Michigan pre-participation physical form available from the Michigan Department of Community Health. The updated form conforms to the AHA guidelines and will help improve the screening process.
Making sure that all Michigan schools, public and private, use the new forms and that the screenings are performed by physicians familiar with the guidelines is an important next step.
"Simply improving pre-participation screening forms and conducting electrocardiograms on properly selected children and adults may help reduce cardiac deaths," says Sharlene M. Day, M.D., director of the Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Clinic at the U-M Cardiovascular Center. "It is also very important for athletes, their families, and their coaches to recognize potential warning signs, like a seizure, passing out, or shortness of breath."
Yet there is still more that can be done to try to reduce the incidence of sudden cardiac death.
U-M experts support having automated external defibrillators available in schools and training coaches and other school personnel on use and maintenance of the devices. Yearly training in basic life support or CPR for coaches and trainers will help them respond as quickly as possible in an emergency.
Emergency response training programs will have the added benefit of not only improving a school's ability to respond to an emergency that occurs on the sports field but to any emergencies that occur on school property. It will also prepare individuals who will take their emergency response skills to their home and to their community.
Featured Angina| Acute Coronary Syndrome and Heart Disease Interviews
|
Highlights of Article by Dr. Erik Hess et of Mayo Clinic ;CIRCOUTCOMES 2012
|
-
Chest pain is the 2nd most common reason patients come to EDs across the United States
-
Initial testing – including information obtained from the history, physical exam, electrocardiogram, and cardiac troponin – identifies > 98% of heart attacks
-
To avoid missing a diagnosis of heart attack or pre-heart attack symptoms, emergency physicians often admit patients to observation units or to the hospital for extensive diagnostic testing, including stress testing
-
This results in false positive test results, unnecessary exposure to radiation, and unnecessary downstream procedures such as stent placement in arteries of the heart
-
Decision aids are evidence-based tools designed to educate and engage patients in decisions regarding their care
-
We hypothesized that patients who were educated regarding their future risk for a heart attack and engaged in the decision of whether to be admitted to the observation unit for stress testing or to follow-up with a Mayo Clinic heart doctor in the next 72 hours would have greater knowledge about their short-term risk for heart attack, be more aware of the management options, and choose less intensive approaches to evaluation
-
We randomly assigned 204 patients who came to the ED with chest pain and were being considered for observation unit admission to the decision aid or to usual care
-
Decision aid patients:
-
Had greater knowledge regarding their short-term risk for a heart attack
-
Less frequently decided to be admitted to the observation unit for stress testing
-
Had 4 times greater engagement in the decision making process
-
Had no adverse events within 30 days of the ED visit
-
Take home points
-
Patients want to be educated and engaged in decisions regarding their care
-
Once properly informed and engaged in treatment decisions, patients often choose less intensive treatment options
-
Integrated health systems like the Mayo Clinic in which physicians collaboratively work together to provide ER patients ready access to outpatient follow-up have potential to improve the value of Emergency care
|
|
|
|
Glucose, Insulin and Potassium (“GIK”) TO MINIMIZE IMPACT OF HEART ATTACKS BEFORE PATIENTS GET TO THE HOSPITAL
Study puts life-saving drugs in the hands of paramedics, decreasing rate of cardiac arrest and death from heart attacks
CHICAGO (March 27, 2012) — Paramedics can potentially reduce someone’s chances of having a cardiac arrest or dying by 50 percent by immediately administering a mixture of glucose, insulin and potassium (“GIK”) to people having a heart attack, according to research presented today at the American College of Cardiology’s 61st Annual Scientific Session. The Scientific Session, the premier cardiovascular medical meeting, brings cardiovascular professionals together to further advances in the field.
The study showed that patients who received GIK immediately after being diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome — which indicates a possible heart attack is either in progress or on the way — were 50 percent less likely to have cardiac arrest (a condition in which the heart suddenly stops beating) or die than those who received a placebo, although the treatment did not prevent the heart attack from occurring. The reduction in in-hospital cardiac arrest or death was a “secondary endpoint”, so statistically was not definitive, but was consistent with how GIK seems to work in experimental models of heart attack.
The effect was also present for patients with ST-elevation heart attacks, which require immediate treatment. For those patients, immediate GIK was associated with a 60 percent reduction in in-hospital cardiac arrest or death.
“When started immediately in the home or on the way to the hospital — even before the diagnosis is completely established — GIK appears not completely prevent any heart attack from occurring, but appeared in this trial to reduce the size of heart attacks and to reduce by half the risk of having a cardiac arrest or dying,” said Harry P. Selker, MD, MSPH, executive director of the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies at Tufts Medical Center, who led the study with Joni Beshansky, RN, MPH, co-principal investigator and project director. “Acute coronary syndromes represent the largest cause of death in this country. GIK is a very inexpensive treatment that appears to have promise in reducing those deaths and morbidity.”
The cost of the treatment is about $50.
“Because the trial is the first to show GIK could be effective when used by paramedics in real-world community settings, it could have important implications for the treatment of heart attacks,” Dr. Selker said. Previous clinical trials have shown no consistent effect, likely because the GIK was given too late to help. This study, the “IMMEDIATE Trial,” was the first to test the effectiveness of administering GIK at the very first signs of a threatening heart attack, in the community, rather than waiting hours until the diagnosis was well-established at a hospital, as done in previous clinical trials.
“We wanted to do something that is effective and can be used anywhere,” said Dr. Selker. “We’ve done a lot of studies of acute cardiac care in emergency departments and hospitals, but more people die of heart attacks outside the hospital than inside the hospital. Hundreds of thousands of people per year are dying out in the community; we wanted to direct our attention to those patients.”
The researchers trained paramedics in 36 Emergency Medical Services systems in 13 cities across the country to administer GIK after determining that a patient was likely having a threatened or already established heart attack using electrocardiograph-based ACI-TIPI (acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument) and thrombolytic predictive instrument decision support that prints patient-specific predictions on the top of an electrocardiogram. The paramedics used these predictions to decide if a patient would likely benefit from treatment. There were 911 patients randomized to receive either the GIK treatment or a placebo.
Administering GIK immediately also reduced the severity of the damage to the heart tissue from the heart attack. On average, 2 percent of the heart tissue was destroyed by the heart attack in people receiving GIK, compared with 10 percent in those who received the placebo. Although a significant proportion of suspected heart attacks are later determined to be false alarms (23 percent in this study), administering GIK does not appear to cause any harmful effects in such patients.
The research team will follow up with study participants at six and 12 months to evaluate the longer-term benefit of the GIK treatment.
This study was funded by the NIH’s National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.
|
|
Keywords and tags:
Angina, atypical angina, heart disease,chest pain, angina pectoris, chest pains, cardiology ,ivabradine for chronic angina, emergency room evaluation of chest pain, heart attacks, cardiac syndrome X,cpr, heart disease in women, cholesterol, lipids, heart medications, aspirin, cardiologists, ekg, ecg, echocardiology, heart surgery, bypass surgery, stents, spiral CTs, 64 slice CTs, chest pain, heart risk factors, cardiology news, angina.com, CRP, C Reactive Protein, troponins, troponin I, troponin T, Prinzmetal's angina, nitrates, angina treatment, JUPITER study, Crestor, CHF, congestive heart failure, Avandia, myeloperoxidase, MPO, biomarkers, AEDs, cardiac defibrillators, cardiac CTs, coronary 64 slice scanners,128 slice CT, 256 Cat Scan, Vitamin D and heart disease, Get with the Program -Coronary Artery Disease updates, Acute Coronary Syndrome, stress tests, thallium stress test, PCI, angioplasty, CABG, coronary artery bypass surgery, calcium
Angina | Heart Disease Resourses
| Chest Pain
Amazon.com 's Editorial Reviews
Angina: New Ways to Treat
Chronic Chest Pain
Part of the award winning public television series Healthy head
/Healthy Mind. It's one of the scariest medical symptoms for people who are generally healthy: a tightening, painful feeling in the chest known as Angina. In some cases this chest pain can be a serious warning that requires immediate treatment. But for the millions of people with chronic, stable angina the discomfort is something that can be readily managed with a variety of treatments. In this program we take a look at what generally causes angina, what can be done to prevent it and how it can be effectively treated with lifestyle changes, innovative drug therapies and medical procedures.
|
Amazon.com Editorial Review:
Philips HeartStart Home Defibrillator (AED)
Be prepared for the unexpected.
When sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) strikes, the electrical system of the heart short circuits, causing the heart to quiver rather than pump in a normal rhythm. It typically results in the abnormal heart rhythm know as ventricular fibrillation (VF). It usually happens without warning and the majority of people have no previously recognized symptoms of heart disease. And it most often happens at home. For the best chance of survival from SCA caused by VF, a defibrillator should be used within 5 minutes. Yet, less than 1 in 20 people survive largely because a defibrillator does not arrive in time.
Just as seat belts or airbags do not save every life in a traffic accident, a defibrillator will not save every person who suffers a sudden cardiac arrest. Yet many lives could be saved if more people could be reached more quickly.
|

|
Angina.com Tag Cloud | Angina Keywords
|
**************************************
|