Angina.com

'For Angina News and Heart Disease Information'
angina, unstable angina, chronic angina,angina pectoris,
variant angina
, angina news, angina treatment

  More Angina - Heart Disease Interviews Angina Blog
Custom Search

CDC: Coronary Heart Disease Rates Continue to Fall

Home

Angina Author Interviews

What is Angina or Angina Pectoris?

Heart Anatomy

ACCORD Study in Heart Disease

A Fib - Atrial Fibrillation

Alcohol & Heart Disease

Anemia & Cardiovascular Disease

Angina & Depression

Angina Devices

Angina Quizzes

Angina Medications

Angina Risk Factors

Angina Terms

Angioplasty - PCI Studies

Aspirin & Coronary Artery Disease

Biomarkers of Angina & Heart Disease

BNP and Heart Failure

What is an EKG?

Calcium Channel Blockers & Angina

Calcium Scores in Angina - CAD

Cardiac Defibrillators - Types

Cardiac Defibrillators
Public Access

Cardiac_Events_Calendar

Cardiac Resources

Cardiac Troponins

C16 -64-128- 256 Slice
Coronary CT Angiogram
Coronary CT Scans
Cardiac CAT Scan
Spiral CT Scans

Cardiology Updates and
Angina News

Chest Pain

Chemotherapy Cardiotoxicity

CHF:
Congestive Heart Failure

Chocolate & Heart Disease

CRP - C Reactive Protein

Coffee & Arrythmias

Cool Science: Growing new coronary arteries?

Coronary Artery Disease and Kidney Disease

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafts|CABG for CAD

Costs of Angina - Heart Disease

CPR for Cardiac Arrest

Cystatin-C and Heart Disease

Dabigatra | Pradexa

Dental - Gum Disease & Cardiovascular Disease

Diet & Cardiovascular Disease

Diabetes & Heart Disease

Emergency Room Evaluation of Chest Pain and Angina

Employment Issues with Heart Disease Angina or MI

Erectile Dysfunction ED and CAD

Ethnicity & Angina - Heart Disease Studies

Exercise and Angina

Extracorporeal Life Support

Fibrinogen in Heart Disease

Genetics & Coronary Artery Ds.

Get With the Guidelines:
Coronary Artery Disease
GWTD-CAD

Green Tea & Heart Disease

Heart Attack Studies Myocardial Infarction Cardiac Arrest

Heart and Kidney Disease

HEART SCORE

HDL vs LDL Cholesterol

Homocysteine & Heart Disease

Ivrabadine & Angina

JUPITER Study of Crestor

Crestor | Heart Attack |Stroke Prevention

Ludwig's Angina

Micro RNAs in Heart Disease

MR Angiography & Angina

Myeloperoxidase | MPO and cardiac risk

Nitrates for Angina Treatment

Non Cardiac Chest Pain

Pacemaker Studies

PCI vs Medical Therapy of CAD

Plavix |Plavix & Proton Pump Inhibitors

Post CABG Depression

Prinzmetal Angina

Race - Angina & Heart Disease

Ranexa - Ranolazine in Chronic Angina treatment

Rosiglitazone | Avandia and Heart Disease?

Sleep and Heart Disease - Angina

SPECT Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease

Statins for Lipids & Heart Disease

Stem Cells for Heart Disease

STEMI vs NSTEMI Angina?

Stents for Angina and Coronary Heart Disease

Stent Apposition in Coronary Arteries

Stress Tests
Adenosine Stress Tests
Nuclear Stress Testing Thallium Stress Testing

Smoking Ban: Lowered Angina & Cardiovascular Admissions

TakoTsubo Cardiomyopathy

Women: Angina & Heart Disease

Angina News

Angina and Cardiology News Feeds

Vitamin D and Heart Disease

Medical Disclaimer
Please Read

Contact Us:
info@angina.com

 
 
 
 

 

 


Author Interview: Dr. Reid: Calcium Supplements with/without
Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Risk

Author Interview: Dr. Ian R Reid

Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women’s Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis

Mark J Bolland, Andrew Grey Alison Avenell, Greg D Gamble, Ian R Reid
BMJ 2011; 342:d2040 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d2040

Author Affiliations

1Department of Medicine, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92 019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
2Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, Scotland


 
What are the main findings of the study?


This study were altogether a number of previous trials which have blue report of the effects of calcium, with or without vitamin D, on heart attacks and strokes stop the compilation of the data demonstrated that the use of calcium was associated with a 25% increase in the risk of heart attacks, and a 15% increase on strokes.

Were any of the findings unexpected?

These findings were not really unexpected, since we produced a similar outcome from an analysis of trials of calcium alone, last year. The current study involved a reanalysis of data from the Women's Health Initiative, which had previously reported that there was no increase in risk of heart attacks and strokes with calcium plus vitamin D. One of the issues with that study was that it allowed subjects in the study to self-medicate with calcium and vitamin D.

We have suggested that this may have obscured an adverse effect of the trial intervention. The present study restricted the analysis to those individuals not self-medicating with calcium and vitamin D, and found that, in this group, randomisation to calcium plus vitamin D caused an adverse effect. This latter change in conclusions from the Woman's Health Initiative, might have been unexpected to some.


What should clinicians and patients take away from this study?

The implications of this work are that the use of calcium supplements for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis probably causes more harm (in terms of heart attacks and strokes) than good (in terms of fractures prevented). These comments relate to the use of calcium supplements – there is no evidence that calcium-rich foods in the diet carry an adverse effect.

The implications of this work are that we should back off from the use of calcium supplements, encourage people to have adequate calcium in the diet, and provided appropriate medications to those individuals whose risk of fracture is high enough to justify it. Individuals at high risk of fracture should not be relying on calcium alone as their strategy to prevent future fractures.

What recommendations do you have for cardiology health care providers as a result of your study?

To discourage the use of calcium supplements, except in a small number of people with very specific abnormalities of calcium metabolism.

Prof Ian Reid
Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences
University of Auckland
Private Bag 92019
Auckland New Zealand
Physical and courier address:
Level 6 ECom House, Room 25
3 Ferncroft St, Grafton, Auckland

 

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the effects of personal calcium supplement use on cardiovascular risk in the Women’s Health Initiative Calcium/Vitamin D Supplementation Study (WHI CaD Study), using the WHI dataset, and to update the recent meta-analysis of calcium supplements and cardiovascular risk.

Design Reanalysis of WHI CaD Study limited access dataset and incorporation in meta-analysis with eight other studies.

Data source WHI CaD Study, a seven year, randomised, placebo controlled trial of calcium and vitamin D (1g calcium and 400 IU vitamin D daily) in 36 282 community dwelling postmenopausal women.
Main outcome measures Incidence of four cardiovascular events and their combinations (myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation, death from coronary heart disease, and stroke) assessed with patient-level data and trial-level data.

Results In the WHI CaD Study there was an interaction between personal use of calcium supplements and allocated calcium and vitamin D for cardiovascular events. In the 16 718 women (46%) who were not taking personal calcium supplements at randomisation the hazard ratios for cardiovascular events with calcium and vitamin D ranged from 1.13 to 1.22 (P=0.05 for clinical myocardial infarction or stroke, P=0.04 for clinical myocardial infarction or revascularisation), whereas in the women taking personal calcium supplements cardiovascular risk did not alter with allocation to calcium and vitamin D.

In meta-analyses of three placebo controlled trials, calcium and vitamin D increased the risk of myocardial infarction (relative risk 1.21 (95% confidence interval 1.01 to 1.44), P=0.04), stroke (1.20 (1.00 to 1.43), P=0.05), and the composite of myocardial infarction or stroke (1.16 (1.02 to 1.32), P=0.02). In meta-analyses of placebo controlled trials of calcium or calcium and vitamin D, complete trial-level data were available for 28 072 participants from eight trials of calcium supplements and the WHI CaD participants not taking personal calcium supplements.

In total 1384 individuals had an incident myocardial infarction or stroke. Calcium or calcium and vitamin D increased the risk of myocardial infarction (relative risk 1.24 (1.07 to 1.45), P=0.004) and the composite of myocardial infarction or stroke (1.15 (1.03 to 1.27), P=0.009).

Conclusions Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D modestly increase the risk of cardiovascular events, especially myocardial infarction, a finding obscured in the WHI CaD Study by the widespread use of personal calcium supplements. A reassessment of the role of calcium supplements in osteoporosis management is warranted.

 

 

Featured Angina| Acute Coronary Syndrome and Heart Disease Interviews

The Chest Pain Choice Decision Aid: A Randomized Trial

Highlights of Article by Dr. Erik Hess et of Mayo Clinic ;CIRCOUTCOMES 2012


  • Chest pain is the 2nd most common reason patients come to EDs across the United States

  • Initial testing – including information obtained from the history, physical exam, electrocardiogram, and cardiac troponin – identifies > 98% of heart attacks

  • To avoid missing a diagnosis of heart attack or pre-heart attack symptoms, emergency physicians often admit patients to observation units or to the hospital for extensive diagnostic testing, including stress testing

  • This results in false positive test results, unnecessary exposure to radiation, and unnecessary downstream procedures such as stent placement in arteries of the heart

  • Decision aids are evidence-based tools designed to educate and engage patients in decisions regarding their care

  • We hypothesized that patients who were educated regarding their future risk for a heart attack and engaged in the decision of whether to be admitted to the observation unit for stress testing or to follow-up with a Mayo Clinic heart doctor in the next 72 hours would have greater knowledge about their short-term risk for heart attack, be more aware of the management options, and choose less intensive approaches to evaluation

  • We randomly assigned 204 patients who came to the ED with chest pain and were being considered for observation unit admission to the decision aid or to usual care

  • Decision aid patients:

    • Had greater knowledge regarding their short-term risk for a heart attack

    • Less frequently decided to be admitted to the observation unit for stress testing

    • Had 4 times greater engagement in the decision making process

    • Had no adverse events within 30 days of the ED visit

  • Take home points

    • Patients want to be educated and engaged in decisions regarding their care

    • Once properly informed and engaged in treatment decisions, patients often choose less intensive treatment options

    • Integrated health systems like the Mayo Clinic in which physicians collaboratively work together to provide ER patients ready access to outpatient follow-up have potential to improve the value of Emergency care

 

Glucose, Insulin and Potassium (“GIK”) TO MINIMIZE IMPACT OF HEART ATTACKS BEFORE PATIENTS GET TO THE HOSPITAL

Study puts life-saving drugs in the hands of paramedics, decreasing rate of cardiac arrest and death from heart attacks

CHICAGO (March 27, 2012) — Paramedics can potentially reduce someone’s chances of having a cardiac arrest or dying by 50 percent by immediately administering a mixture of glucose, insulin and potassium (“GIK”) to people having a heart attack, according to research presented today at the American College of Cardiology’s 61st Annual Scientific Session. The Scientific Session, the premier cardiovascular medical meeting, brings cardiovascular professionals together to further advances in the field.

The study showed that patients who received GIK immediately after being diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome — which indicates a possible heart attack is either in progress or on the way — were 50 percent less likely to have cardiac arrest (a condition in which the heart suddenly stops beating) or die than those who received a placebo, although the treatment did not prevent the heart attack from occurring. The reduction in in-hospital cardiac arrest or death was a “secondary endpoint”, so statistically was not definitive, but was consistent with how GIK seems to work in experimental models of heart attack.

The effect was also present for patients with ST-elevation heart attacks, which require immediate treatment. For those patients, immediate GIK was associated with a 60 percent reduction in in-hospital cardiac arrest or death.
“When started immediately in the home or on the way to the hospital — even before the diagnosis is completely established — GIK appears not completely prevent any heart attack from occurring, but appeared in this trial to reduce the size of heart attacks and to reduce by half the risk of having a cardiac arrest or dying,” said Harry P. Selker, MD, MSPH, executive director of the Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies at Tufts Medical Center, who led the study with Joni Beshansky, RN, MPH, co-principal investigator and project director. “Acute coronary syndromes represent the largest cause of death in this country. GIK is a very inexpensive treatment that appears to have promise in reducing those deaths and morbidity.”

The cost of the treatment is about $50.

“Because the trial is the first to show GIK could be effective when used by paramedics in real-world community settings, it could have important implications for the treatment of heart attacks,” Dr. Selker said. Previous clinical trials have shown no consistent effect, likely because the GIK was given too late to help. This study, the “IMMEDIATE Trial,” was the first to test the effectiveness of administering GIK at the very first signs of a threatening heart attack, in the community, rather than waiting hours until the diagnosis was well-established at a hospital, as done in previous clinical trials.

“We wanted to do something that is effective and can be used anywhere,” said Dr. Selker. “We’ve done a lot of studies of acute cardiac care in emergency departments and hospitals, but more people die of heart attacks outside the hospital than inside the hospital. Hundreds of thousands of people per year are dying out in the community; we wanted to direct our attention to those patients.”
The researchers trained paramedics in 36 Emergency Medical Services systems in 13 cities across the country to administer GIK after determining that a patient was likely having a threatened or already established heart attack using electrocardiograph-based ACI-TIPI (acute cardiac ischemia time-insensitive predictive instrument) and thrombolytic predictive instrument decision support that prints patient-specific predictions on the top of an electrocardiogram. The paramedics used these predictions to decide if a patient would likely benefit from treatment. There were 911 patients randomized to receive either the GIK treatment or a placebo.

Administering GIK immediately also reduced the severity of the damage to the heart tissue from the heart attack. On average, 2 percent of the heart tissue was destroyed by the heart attack in people receiving GIK, compared with 10 percent in those who received the placebo. Although a significant proportion of suspected heart attacks are later determined to be false alarms (23 percent in this study), administering GIK does not appear to cause any harmful effects in such patients.

The research team will follow up with study participants at six and 12 months to evaluate the longer-term benefit of the GIK treatment.

This study was funded by the NIH’s National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.

More on Heart Attack Studies

 

 

Keywords and tags:
Angina, atypical angina, heart disease,chest pain, angina pectoris, chest pains, cardiology ,ivabradine for chronic angina, emergency room evaluation of chest pain, heart attacks, cardiac syndrome X,cpr, heart disease in women, cholesterol, lipids, heart medications, aspirin, cardiologists, ekg, ecg, echocardiology, heart surgery, bypass surgery, stents, spiral CTs, 64 slice CTs, chest pain, heart risk factors, cardiology news, angina.com, CRP, C Reactive Protein, troponins, troponin I, troponin T, Prinzmetal's angina, nitrates, angina treatment, JUPITER study, Crestor, CHF, congestive heart failure, Avandia, myeloperoxidase, MPO, biomarkers, AEDs, cardiac defibrillators, cardiac CTs, coronary 64 slice scanners,128 slice CT, 256 Cat Scan, Vitamin D and heart disease, Get with the Program -Coronary Artery Disease updates, Acute Coronary Syndrome, stress tests, thallium stress test, PCI, angioplasty, CABG, coronary artery bypass surgery, calcium

Angina | Heart Disease Resourses | Chest Pain

Amazon.com 's Editorial Reviews

Angina: New Ways to Treat
Chronic Chest Pain

Part of the award winning public television series Healthy head /Healthy Mind. It's one of the scariest medical symptoms for people who are generally healthy: a tightening, painful feeling in the chest known as Angina. In some cases this chest pain can be a serious warning that requires immediate treatment. But for the millions of people with chronic, stable angina the discomfort is something that can be readily managed with a variety of treatments. In this program we take a look at what generally causes angina, what can be done to prevent it and how it can be effectively treated with lifestyle changes, innovative drug therapies and medical procedures.

Amazon.com Editorial Review:

Philips HeartStart Home Defibrillator (AED)

Be prepared for the unexpected.
When sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) strikes, the electrical system of the heart short circuits, causing the heart to quiver rather than pump in a normal rhythm. It typically results in the abnormal heart rhythm know as ventricular fibrillation (VF). It usually happens without warning and the majority of people have no previously recognized symptoms of heart disease. And it most often happens at home. For the best chance of survival from SCA caused by VF, a defibrillator should be used within 5 minutes. Yet, less than 1 in 20 people survive largely because a defibrillator does not arrive in time.
Just as seat belts or airbags do not save every life in a traffic accident, a defibrillator will not save every person who suffers a sudden cardiac arrest. Yet many lives could be saved if more people could be reached more quickly.

 

 

cardiac defibrillator, heart start defibrillator

Philips HeartStart Home Defibrillator (AED)

Angina.com Tag Cloud | Angina Keywords

 

created at TagCrowd.com
 

 

**************************************

For advertising information, please email info@angina.com

Angina.com Angina and Heart Disease Information and Updates

 

         

Copyright 2012  EminentDomains.com®. All Rights Reserved.
Our Success is Linked to Your Success®

The information on Angina.com is for informational purposes only and is not intended as specific medical advice or to be a substitute for medical advice from your physician or health care provider. Please check with a physician if you need a diagnosis and/or for treatments as well as information regarding your specific condition. If you are experiencing urgent medical conditions, call 9-1-1
Please visit other Eminent Domains Inc sites including
AutoRentalGuide.com, FightAcne.com, CarRentalUpgrade.com, DermatologistsBlog.com, AntiAgingProduct.com, HemoDialysis.com ,
JobOffers.com ,RentalProperties.com, WeightControl.com , FrequentFliers.com
Contact email: info@angina.com