Author Interview Bairey Merz CN.
Ranolazine improves angina in women with evidence of myocardial ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 May;4(5):514-22.
Mehta PK, Goykhman P, Thomson LE, Shufelt C, Wei J, Yang Y, Gill E, Minissian M, Shaw LJ, Slomka PJ, Slivka M, Berman DS, Bairey Merz CN.
What are the main findings of the study?
IN A PILOT STUDY, RANOLAZINE APPEARS EFFECTIVE FOR IMPROVING MICROVASCULAR ANGINA MEASURED BY THE SEATTLE ANGINA QUESTIONNIARE (SAQ) AND MAY BE EFFECTIVE FOR MICROVASCULAR ISCHEMIA MEASURED BY CARDIAC MRI PERFUSION. A LARGER STUDY BASED ON THIS PILOT FINDINGS HAS BEEN INITIATED.
Were any of the findings unexpected?
NO
What should clinicians and patients take away from this study?
RANOLAZINE IS CURRENTLY INDICATED FOR "ANGINA"; THE CURRENT STUDY RESULTS SUGGEST EFFICACY FOR ANGINA DUE TO MICROVASCULAR CORONARY DYSFUNCTION
What recommendations do you have for cardiology health care providers as a result of your study?
ANGINA, REGARDLESS OF ETIOLOGY, IDENTIFIES A PATIENT AT HIGHER RISK FOR ADVERSE CARDIAC EVENTS. ATTENTION TO AND TREATMENT OF ANGINA IS IMPORTANT.
Abstract
Ranolazine improves angina in women with evidence of myocardial ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 May;4(5):514-22.
Mehta PK, Goykhman P, Thomson LE, Shufelt C, Wei J, Yang Y, Gill E, Minissian M, Shaw LJ, Slomka PJ, Slivka M, Berman DS, Bairey Merz CN.Women's Heart Center, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, Los Angeles, California.
OBJECTIVES:
We conducted a pilot study for a large definitive clinical trial evaluating the impact of ranolazine in women with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).
BACKGROUND:
Women with angina, evidence of myocardial ischemia, but no obstructive CAD frequently have microvascular coronary dysfunction. The impact of ranolazine in this patient group is unknown.
METHODS:
A pilot randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial was conducted in 20 women with angina, no obstructive CAD, and ≥10% ischemic myocardium on adenosine stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. Participants were assigned to ranolazine or placebo for 4 weeks separated by a 2-week washout. The Seattle Angina Questionnaire and CMR were evaluated after each treatment. Invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) was available in patients who underwent clinically indicated coronary reactivity testing. CMR data analysis included the percentage of ischemic myocardium and quantitative myocardial perfusion reserve index (MPRI).
RESULTS:
The mean age of subjects was 57 ± 11 years. Compared with placebo, patients on ranolazine had significantly higher (better) Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores, including physical functioning (p = 0.046), angina stability (p = 0.008), and quality of life (p = 0.021). There was a trend toward a higher (better) CMR mid-ventricular MPRI (2.4 [2.0 minimum, 2.8 maximum] vs. 2.1 [1.7 minimum, 2.5 maximum], p = 0.074) on ranolazine. Among women with coronary reactivity testing (n = 13), those with CFR ≤3.0 had a significantly improved MPRI on ranolazine versus placebo compared to women with CFR >3.0 (Δ in MPRI 0.48 vs. -0.82, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS:
In women with angina, evidence of ischemia, and no obstructive CAD, this pilot randomized, controlled trial revealed that ranolazine improves angina. Myocardial ischemia may also improve, particularly among women with low CFR. These data document approach feasibility and provide outcome variability estimates for planning a definitive large clinical trial to evaluate the role of ranolazine in women with microvascular coronary dysfunction. (Microvascular Coronary Disease In Women: Impact Of Ranolazine; NCT00570089)
Featured Angina and Heart Disease Abstracts:
|
Recent Changes in Practice of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Angina
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes.
doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.110.957175
-
Bina Ahmed, MD, Harold L. Dauerman, MD, Winthrop D. Piper, PhD,John F. Robb, MD,
Peter Verlee, MD,Thomas J. Ryan Jr, MD,David Goldberg, MD, Richard A. Boss Jr, MD,William J. Phillips, MD, Frank Fedele, MD,David Butzel, MD,David J. Malenka, MD and on behalf of the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study
Background The COURAGE (Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation) trial was designed to compare optimal medical therapy alone versus optimal medical therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for treatment of patients with stable coronary artery disease and showed equal efficacy for optimal medical therapy with or without PCI. The impact of results from the COURAGE trial on clinical practice is unknown.
Methods and Results We analyzed 26 388 consecutive patients from the Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease PCI Registry who underwent PCI between January 2006 and June 2009.
We identified a COURAGE-like patient group as patients who were undergoing (1) an elective procedure; (2) for an indication of stable angina; and (3) on the day of admission (ie, the date of admission was the same as the procedure date). All other PCI patients were placed in an “other indications” cohort.
We compared temporal trends in overall volume in PCI for stable angina and for other indications, comparing quarterly time periods before and after release of COURAGE in March 2007. Over the study period, there was a statistically significant decrease in total PCI volume from 2064 in Quarter 1 2006 (before COURAGE) to 1708 in Quarter 3 2007 (after COURAGE) (P<0.01).
These trends were sustained through June 2009, with an approximate 16% peak relative reduction in all PCI compared with before COURAGE. As a percentage of all PCI, stable angina reached a high of 20.9% before COURAGE and began to decrease immediately after publication of COURAGE in Quarter 2 2007 to 16.1% (P<0.01).
Among patients undergoing PCI for stable angina, there was a significant 26% peak decrease in post-COURAGE PCI volumes compared with pre-COURAGE Quarter 1 2006 (P trend, 0.01), which was maintained through the end of the study period.
Conclusions Publication of results from the COURAGE trial was temporally associated with a significant and sustained decline in the use of PCI to treat patients with stable angina. The long-term impact of this change in practice on patient outcomes remains to be determined. |
Abstract
Background— Despite data showing the benefits of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion for primary prevention in populations at risk for sudden death, professional society guidelines recommending primary prevention, and recognition by payers of the clinical value of ICDs in these populations, ICDs for primary prevention remain underused. We sought to determine whether implementing a screening tool would increase appropriate identification of patients showing clinical evidence of ICD benefit and prompt referral to an electrophysiologist for ICD implantation.
Methods and Results— Screening tools were affixed to medical records for patients seen in 2 outpatient cardiology offices that queried ejection fraction and whether referral to an electrophysiologist was made (N=6632).
The number of appropriate referrals in the screening period were compared with analogous data collected before implementation of the screening tool (control period) through retrospective record review (n=3606). Significantly more eligible patients were offered referral during the screening period than during the control period at both sites, 80% (8/10 eligible) versus 33% (5/15) at site 1 (P<0.02) and 100% (44/44) versus 60% (21/35) at site 2 (P<0.001). Of all patients offered referral, 41% (32/78) accepted.
Conclusions— The use of a screening tool increases referral to electrophysiology for patients in whom placement of an ICD confers the benefit of sudden cardiac death primary prevention. Barriers to referral include both physician and patient factors. Verification of these findings on a larger scale as well as studies defining the foundation of these barriers may further improve use of ICDs in patients for whom their mortality benefit is well described.
|
Keywords and tags:
Angina, atypical angina, heart disease,chest pain, angina pectoris, chest pains, cardiology ,ivabradine for chronic angina, emergency room evaluation of chest pain, heart attacks, cardiac syndrome X,cpr, heart disease in women, cholesterol, lipids, heart medications, aspirin, cardiologists, ekg, ecg, echocardiology, heart surgery, bypass surgery, stents, spiral CTs, 64 slice CTs, chest pain, heart risk factors, cardiology news, angina.com, CRP, C Reactive Protein, troponins, troponin I, troponin T, Prinzmetal's angina, nitrates, angina treatment, JUPITER study, Crestor, CHF, congestive heart failure, Avandia, myeloperoxidase, MPO, biomarkers, AEDs, cardiac defibrillators, cardiac CTs, coronary 64 slice scanners,128 slice CT, 256 Cat Scan, Vitamin D and heart disease, Get with the Program -Coronary Artery Disease updates, Acute Coronary Syndrome, stress tests, thallium stress test, PCI, angioplasty, CABG, coronary artery bypass surgery, calcium
Angina | Heart Disease Resourses
| Chest Pain
Amazon.com 's Editorial Reviews
Angina: New Ways to Treat
Chronic Chest Pain
Part of the award winning public television series Healthy Body/Healthy Mind. It's one of the scariest medical symptoms for people who are generally healthy: a tightening, painful feeling in the chest known as Angina. In some cases this chest pain can be a serious warning that requires immediate treatment. But for the millions of people with chronic, stable angina the discomfort is something that can be readily managed with a variety of treatments. In this program we take a look at what generally causes angina, what can be done to prevent it and how it can be effectively treated with lifestyle changes, innovative drug therapies and medical procedures.
|
Amazon.com Editorial Review:
Philips HeartStart Home Defibrillator (AED)
Be prepared for the unexpected.
When sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) strikes, the electrical system of the heart short circuits, causing the heart to quiver rather than pump in a normal rhythm. It typically results in the abnormal heart rhythm know as ventricular fibrillation (VF). It usually happens without warning and the majority of people have no previously recognized symptoms of heart disease. And it most often happens at home. For the best chance of survival from SCA caused by VF, a defibrillator should be used within 5 minutes. Yet, less than 1 in 20 people survive largely because a defibrillator does not arrive in time.
Just as seat belts or airbags do not save every life in a traffic accident, a defibrillator will not save every person who suffers a sudden cardiac arrest. Yet many lives could be saved if more people could be reached more quickly.
|

|
Angina.com Tag Cloud | Angina Keywords
|
**************************************
|